• iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unlike means testing, it will cost nothing. You just update the list of what is covered. Then it’s forever banned from food stamps

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      as someone else pointed out a specific example that comes up regularly (this is apparently already how it works): 1 particular brand of peanut butter was available, but their lite version wasn’t… with a cart full of groceries, figuring out exactly what gets paid for with what or what needs to be put back isn’t a fast process… this takes not only the persons time, but the cashiers time and everyone behind them in the queue

      these are things we call negative externalities: costs forced to other places in the system without being accounted for in price

      there are many, many, MANY more costs associated with any government program and intervention but this specific example would cost the country as a whole far more than the occasional unhealthy snack

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        But it’s not lite peanut butter. It’s all items that are marked candy and soda. That’s a clear category

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          that’s not how any of this works… UPC codes (barcodes) only have the category as broad as “Food, Beverages & Tobacco”, brand names, product names, etc

          you have to maintain some database of UPC numbers to categories, which is how things like variants of peanut butter slip through… and good luck if you want to buy some smaller brand that isn’t on the governments radar