No one? Seems like it would fall under self defense. It was self defense and self preservation that made innie hold the gun on him, and the trigger was pulled on accident. If I were a lawyer I could probably find a relevant case.
Why would a cosmically fair tribunal demand someone be found guilty? That doesn’t seem fair at all if nobody was guilty. What code of ethics are they abiding by then?
Since the trigger was pulled accidentally because of the transition, wouldn’t the one ultimately responsible be Jame Eagan, as he (on paper) is the inventor of the process?
No one? Seems like it would fall under self defense. It was self defense and self preservation that made innie hold the gun on him, and the trigger was pulled on accident. If I were a lawyer I could probably find a relevant case.
The Tribunal demands a conviction. The Napoleonic code seems silly from their perspective.
Why would a cosmically fair tribunal demand someone be found guilty? That doesn’t seem fair at all if nobody was guilty. What code of ethics are they abiding by then?
The demand for a guilty party comes from the same cosmic bung hole that the Lutherans pulled their theological stance on innie-souls from!
If you agree with the self defense position, wouldn’t that mean in this case that the person responsible for his death is himself?
Or if you’re just asking who pulled the trigger, it seems like it was on the outie side of the transition.
Since the trigger was pulled accidentally because of the transition, wouldn’t the one ultimately responsible be Jame Eagan, as he (on paper) is the inventor of the process?