• galanthus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is a crisis in Europe because of lack of investment, are you sure it is not your problem?

    • Triasha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I do in fact wish we had European problems. That would be a massive upgrade. We should be so lucky.

      • galanthus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, when welfare and pensions are butchered because the EU is trying to salvage the deindustrialising increasingly uncompetitive economy by pouring lots of money in the military-industrial complex instead of social services this is going to be soooo awesome. Only Europe is going to be doing that in a much more fiscally constrained environment that America. Greaaaat.

        • Triasha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You are trying to scare me, an American, by saying that if Europe keeps going the way they are going someday they might be as terrible a place to live as America.

          That’s better odds than my current reality. I’m guaranteed to live in a country no social safety net and a constrained fiscal environment because that describes America right fucking now.

          Again, we should be so lucky.

          • galanthus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            I would say that America can afford a safety net, it just doesn’t do it for ideological reasons.

            I mean, I am not trying to scare you, just showing you that a lack of investment is bad.

            • Triasha@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Really sounds like you are arguing in favor of those ideological reasons.

              I’m not saying we should take the fortunes of the rich and light them on fire. (Though there would be benefits even to that destructive approach)

              Sure, eating the rich would not solve all our problems forever. It would solve some immediate problems today, and future generations would need to grapple with their problems tomorrow.

              “We can’t change things! There would be costs!” There are costs to inaction. We are paying them every day.

              • galanthus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                If you get rid of the rich, what will you do then? The institutions we have now, the social order we have now, what will you replace it with? Who will control the economy and by what means?

                • Triasha@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Some new asshole I have no doubt. Are you giving me a magic wand? The powers of a dictator? How broad can I make the changes for this fully functional society you are implicitly asking me to dream up on Lemmy?

                  I’m just one person. We have a whole as society to figure that stuff out.