• Tsiolkovsky’all@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Civil society requires the willing participation of the populace. It’s the best kind of society, but it’s only available to a culture that has decided not to be assholes.

    I choose not to be an asshole. Even when it would be easy. Even when it would improve my life or mood or bank balance. I refuse to idolize people that are assholes. Even if they’re rich.

    Even in the strictest of command economies, the opportunity to be an asshole exists. You can’t command your way into a scenario where the choice of villainy is simply unavailable. Every single one of us has to make the choice to turn away from the pull of assholery ourselves and to refuse to countenance it in others.

    I still believe that we, as a species, have both the capability and the requirement to step back from that cliff. We’ve done it before. Mostly, I don’t want to live in the world your approach would create. I think the only people that would enjoy it are the folks you’ve given your free will away to.

    • galanthus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Then why tax the rich at all? Let them choose for themselves how much they want to give.

      • Tsiolkovsky’all@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Why do you persist in treating the rich differently? They are just people. They aren’t a special class of people that are better or smarter. They just have more money.

        Treat everyone the same, and this comes out as “why tax people”. Well, that’s a complicated question with a pretty clear answer that I don’t think is worth repeating.

        Stop assuming they’re better than you. They aren’t.