• kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Personally I think the opposite is better, we need more people telling Windows users “hey if you’re going to Linux expecting Windows just use Windows”. The simple fact is Linux is not a Windows replacement because Linux is fundamentally not Windows. For Linux users like me thats absolutely incredible (we dont want Windows but OSS), but for people who love Windows less so. Linux desktops look different (especially Gnome), Linux software works differently, the terminal is completely different on Linux (its not needed to use Linux but its so powerful that learning it is reccomend), there are installation files (DEB and RPM) but on Linux most people use software repos, and fundamentally the mindset behind Linux is vastly different from Windows.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I tried to use language a Windows user might understand, obviously not since nobody packages installers for Linux like Windows (because installers suck)

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 minutes ago

          It is very dangerous downloading and installing random packages. It introduces instability since the package manager maintains the entire system and untested packages can create all sorts of issues.

          Best to use native packages that have been tested upstream. If that isn’t possible you want to use some sort of sandbox that can be easily blown away and created. (A container)

          I get where you are coming from but it is best to encourage good practices.