• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We’ve never launched from mars much less have an entire manufacturing plant and refueling station built, so it doesnt really seem pertinent at this juncture to be launching Vulcan rockets and frequent satellites that that technology.

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They use methane because it’s cheap and light. Any other justification is just bullshit greenwashing.

    • MrSpArkle
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      We have flown this experiment on the ISS. It is a chemical process that is over 100 years old and is well understood.

      It’s also the only way to lift any significant mass off of mars, because as you said we have no manufacturing or refueling there. So the rocket must refuel itself.

      It then follows that if Mars is the next major target of exploration, and methane is cheap and abundant, why not get started now? The alternative is to spend a decade qualifying an engine for human space flight after the green light for a crewed mission.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Alright cool but we’ve never used these rockets anywhere other than earth. Their development for future use isn’t an excuse to use them over other types currently.

        Also, Mars has lower gravity and little to no atmosphere, there are definitely other ways in that pointless hypothetical.