• threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s more like Proposal 2, and doesn’t actually solve the main issues with duplicate communities. Proposal 3 solves them quite elegantly.

      • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You seem to like it, but for me the biggest issue is that it’s not going to happen any time soon.

        Merging communities can be done now, as you are well aware 😄

        • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          the biggest issue is that it’s not going to happen any time soon

          Yes, Lemmy development is slow, but Proposal 3 seems like such an elegant solution to me that I think it is worth striving for. There’s also no reason all three Proposals can’t be pursued in parallel, as they each have their own use cases.

          Merging communities can be done now, as you are well aware

          Yes, but it’s a bit of a pain, as you are also aware :)

          • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            There’s also no reason all three Proposals can’t be pursued in parallel, as they each have their own use cases.

            Definitely!

            Aware

            Oh yeah 😄