• BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    he goes far too ranty and repeats himself, it becomes hard to extract the real points.

    I think it holds entertainment value, but if you want to watch the video for informational purposes, yeah I agree :D

    The conversation isn’t focused on the net result, the loss of the pledge, it’s focused elsewhere.

    I stated my opinion about the statement here:

    They should not have deleted that statement and just clarify it instead of their absolutely messy changes…

    So like expand on it instead of deleting it…

    Maybe it is kinda the same as when Google decided to get rid of the “don’t be evil” statement…

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Maybe it is kinda the same as when Google decided to get rid of the “don’t be evil” statement…

      That was exactly what I was thinking of. Although I think there were even better examples with proper canary statements going away in line with the business’ alleged joining of the PRISM program.