As in the software. No part of a linux OS prevents the necessary components, game engines, graphics drivers, etc, from functioning. It runs. You cannot claim otherwise without specifying an adverse environment.
If you’re genuinely trying to convince me that your logic makes sense, please start by justifying double standards, keeping in mind that any genuinely excusable double standard, is by definition, not a double standard.
I’d rather you didn’t, I tuned out when you acknowledged you’re presenting a personal opinion, rather than a generally perceivable consensus.
I am sorry that the peripheral specifics of analogies confuse you, but please be aware that attacking them instead of the point itself, does not invalidate the logic that makes it applicable in illustrating a point.
If requiring every conceivable mode of operation to work, is not always required, then it cannot be arbitrarily sometimes required, “because you say so”.
Then your entire comment chain has been completely (and seemingly intentionally) irrelevant to the point I was making in the first place. In hindsight I suppose that makes sense, since you’ve been building strawmen and tilting at windmills this entire conversation. Literally nobody has said that the games specifically don’t work once the hardware has been made compatible (through software, I should note). Either way, thanks for wasting both of our time.
I tuned out when you acknowledged you’re presenting a personal opinion
And yet here you still are, intentionally misunderstanding the conversation by your own admission, and, once again, wasting everyone’s time in order to white knight for Linux and act like it’s flawless and that everything in the world works when a) that’s objectively not true and b) Linux has no need of this sort of ridiculous white knighting in the first place.
Considering you’re fighting this argument on three+ fronts, I don’t think you can lay the blame of deciding to waste time, on me.
I can’t help you see the point of an analogy, if you insist on fixating on the irrelevant parts you can inconsequentially dismantle while willfully ignoring the actual point.
I’m sorry it took me so long to say it plain, I guess.
As in the software. No part of a linux OS prevents the necessary components, game engines, graphics drivers, etc, from functioning. It runs. You cannot claim otherwise without specifying an adverse environment.
If you’re genuinely trying to convince me that your logic makes sense, please start by justifying double standards, keeping in mind that any genuinely excusable double standard, is by definition, not a double standard.
I’d rather you didn’t, I tuned out when you acknowledged you’re presenting a personal opinion, rather than a generally perceivable consensus.
I am sorry that the peripheral specifics of analogies confuse you, but please be aware that attacking them instead of the point itself, does not invalidate the logic that makes it applicable in illustrating a point.
If requiring every conceivable mode of operation to work, is not always required, then it cannot be arbitrarily sometimes required, “because you say so”.
You will not find majority agreement on this.
Then your entire comment chain has been completely (and seemingly intentionally) irrelevant to the point I was making in the first place. In hindsight I suppose that makes sense, since you’ve been building strawmen and tilting at windmills this entire conversation. Literally nobody has said that the games specifically don’t work once the hardware has been made compatible (through software, I should note). Either way, thanks for wasting both of our time.
And yet here you still are, intentionally misunderstanding the conversation by your own admission, and, once again, wasting everyone’s time in order to white knight for Linux and act like it’s flawless and that everything in the world works when a) that’s objectively not true and b) Linux has no need of this sort of ridiculous white knighting in the first place.
Considering you’re fighting this argument on three+ fronts, I don’t think you can lay the blame of deciding to waste time, on me.
I can’t help you see the point of an analogy, if you insist on fixating on the irrelevant parts you can inconsequentially dismantle while willfully ignoring the actual point.
I’m sorry it took me so long to say it plain, I guess.