• Kuvwert@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve seen this before, but I’ve never been able to verify it as being real.

    • wjrii@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      121
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It was a legitimate protest of a stupid law that uses a legacy of inconsistent thought and limited perception to do an end run around the first amendment, but the text of the law requires a poster per building, so if they have enough in English, there would be no “need” to accept or post them. Now, if a principal or administrator had some balls, I certainly don’t see why they couldn’t use one of these or to flank the posters they do post with lots of context or more diverse ideas.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Now, if a principal or administrator had some balls

        You don’t become a public school middle manager in Texas by showing balls. You’d get weeded out before you even got through the substitute program for teaching gym class.