nahostdeutschland@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago‘The tyranny of apps’: those without smartphones are unfairly penalised, say campaignerswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square332fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down117cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1external-link‘The tyranny of apps’: those without smartphones are unfairly penalised, say campaignerswww.theguardian.comnahostdeutschland@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square332fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squaresem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThey know that a lot of people would rather have it work a little better by getting an app, if they keep reminding people it’s an option. Even if “better” is just lack of nags. It’s sad. We need a digital privacy law so that an app can’t be more invasive than the website.
minus-squareShowroom7561linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 month ago Even if “better” is just lack of nags. Well, they just swap nags from “download our app” to “rate our app” no matter what you do, you’ll be nagged…
They know that a lot of people would rather have it work a little better by getting an app, if they keep reminding people it’s an option.
Even if “better” is just lack of nags.
It’s sad. We need a digital privacy law so that an app can’t be more invasive than the website.
Well, they just swap nags from “download our app” to “rate our app” no matter what you do, you’ll be nagged…