• null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      Where I live in Western Australia they’re not ripping bike lanes out per se, but existing bike infrastructure is just pitiful, and improvements are so painfully slow.

      There’s just no cycling culture here. It’s considered a sport rather than a mode of transport.

      It’s not really clear whether scooters are going to have a positive impact by increasing demand for this infrastructure, or a negative impact by increasing animosity towards anything which is not a car.

  • CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    16 days ago

    Bike lanes have no future in cities that also do not adopt a public transit first approach to city planning and development.

      • CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 days ago

        Because as population increases so will the car congestion. The city can’t physically move skyscrapers further apart, so they’ll sacrifice bike lanes to support cars. If they instead invest in public transit reducing the need for cars in the first place, then there will be plenty of space for bikes

        • JC1
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          You’re right that this is the thinking. But it’s so wrong though. I’m quite sure that a strong bike network reduces cars on the road, aiding car congestion. But you’re right that it’s not what people perceive.

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      What does that really mean though?

      Pretty sure any city would tell you that they’re doing their best to improve public transport.

      The only question is whether their efforts would meet your subjective definition of “public transport first”.