Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agoFraudsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1602arrow-down18
arrow-up1594arrow-down1imageFraudsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoThere are more then one species of tigers though, so the tiger average should be lower. I’m not able to tell what species is pictured there though - if it is siberian, then ok, pretend I didn’t say a word.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoThere are also a couple subspecies of leo but I stated in my comment “assume optimal condition”.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·15 hours agoOk, if optimal condition means optimal species :)
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·15 hours agoI think you’ll agree that a 300 lbs tiger is not the optimal subspecies for a large cat deathmatch. It’s very much suboptimal, yes.
There are more then one species of tigers though, so the tiger average should be lower. I’m not able to tell what species is pictured there though - if it is siberian, then ok, pretend I didn’t say a word.
There are also a couple subspecies of leo but I stated in my comment “assume optimal condition”.
Ok, if optimal condition means optimal species :)
I think you’ll agree that a 300 lbs tiger is not the optimal subspecies for a large cat deathmatch. It’s very much suboptimal, yes.