• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Irrelevant to the topic

    100% relevant, we can feed more people that suddenly have the money to buy food they couldn’t before just by wasting less of what we produce, meaning we don’t need to exploit more land than we do now, impact on production is nil, impact on groceries is positive.

    • ILikeBoobies
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      So your argument is we don’t produce more food, people just buy what is there regardless of age or defects because now they can pay full price for it even though that food is currently discounted and still doesn’t sell

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The reason the food is wasted is because we produce more than people purchase, but at the same time we’ve got people starving, we don’t just waste stuff that has defects.

        Hell, that food that’s too old to sell wasn’t too old to sell from the moment it was produced, I’m sure even you are able to wrap your head around that concept!

        We can feed everyone with the food we already produce if we just let those who are starving be able to get their hands on what we would otherwise waste instead of letting the capitalists win.

        I’m done here, this is ridiculous.