Most online debate is actively harmful to our thinking. Every hour spent arguing on Twitter is an hour we could have spent reading a book, writing an essay, or having a genuine discussion in a better environment.

The Internet promised us a marketplace of ideas. Instead, we built a gladiatorial arena where ideas go to die—time to find better places to think.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    Every platform’s algorithm rewards conflict over clarity, dunks over discourse, and pithy dismissals over patient exploration of ideas. A thoughtful thread exploring the nuances of monetary policy might get a few polite likes. A savage quote-tweet demolishing a bad take? That’s engagement gold.

    It’s framed as that this is about the whole internet, but seems like they are mostly talking about Twitter culture.

    • Rimu@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Mostly, although I think it applies more broadly to varying degrees. Even to Mastodon (although without the Algorithmic amplification aspect).