• otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    Isn’t the opposite the case in Ontario?

    If a landlord shares a certain portion of the home with the tenant, they can kick out the tenant without notice.

    A private landlord can also choose to move themself or a family member into a rented property, kicking out the tenant.

    A corporation can still evict a tenant, but aside from not being able to move themselves or a family member in, they generally have the same tools that a private landlord has.

    Please do correct me if I’m mistaken in any of this though.

    • ILikeBoobies
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      If a landlord shares a certain portion of the home with the tenant, they can kick out the tenant without notice.

      Requires notice, can be appealed, can’t be in winter

      A private landlord can also choose to move themself or a family member into a rented property, kicking out the tenant.

      Same as above, and it needs to go through the board.

      A corporation can still evict a tenant, but aside from not being able to move themselves or a family member in, they generally have the same tools that a private landlord has

      They haven’t been following the rules so in practice there are no rules

    • Jerkface (any/all)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      If a landlord shares a certain portion of the home with the tenant, they can kick out the tenant without notice.

      This is also my understanding. A “roommate” who shares part of your house with you is just a house guest.