• Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    London was dumping raw sewage into the Thames? What the actual fuck? What is wrong with Britain, that’s not okay.

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      Our sewer systems were too old to handle too much rain water, so when it rained heavily, the sewers overflowed into the Thames. Which was intentional, insofar as it’s better than overflowing into the streets, but obviously not ideal.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s disgusting. This isn’t 1895 anymore, and if I’m reading the article right, they still plan to dump raw sewage into the Thames? Just less of it?

        Bright side, I now have a come back whenever someone brings up school shootings.

        • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’m quite certain it happens in the US, too! My understanding is that it’s a normal part of sewage systems to let them overflow into either rivers or the sea. If they get overwhelmed - and any system can get overwhelmed in extreme circumstances - the extra stuff needs to go somewhere, and as I said above it’s better for it to go into a river than for it to back up into the streets!

          Obviously small amounts of poo (human or animal) end up in rivers all the time so there’s a certain amount that the rivers can sort of naturally handle without becoming excessively polluted.

          • Kaboom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            8 days ago

            We don’t, or at least not by the sewer design. Sure, hurricanes and tornadoes can and have destroyed treatment facilities, but that’s not the same thing as intentionally designing for any amount of sewage to enter the waterways.

            • Waterdoc
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 days ago

              The US is a massive country friend, there are lots of places with combined sewers (domestic wastewater and stormwater) that will bypass treatment when there is a big rain event, especially in coastal cities that discharge wastewater to the ocean. It’s not ideal but the alternative is massively oversized treatment plants or replacing all of the existing sewer infrastructure to separate the sewers. Both options would cost tens of billions of dollars in any of the large east coast cities. People are not willing to pay for that.