• dill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah it’s just escalating the issue due to its universal availability. It’s being used in lieu of Google by many people, who blindly trust whatever it spits out.

      If it had a high technological floor of entry, it wouldn’t be as influential to the general public as it is.

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s such a double edged sword though, Google is a good example, I became a netizen at a very young age and learned how to properly search for information over time.

        Unfortunately the vast majority of the population over the last two decades have not put in that effort, and it shows lol.

        Fundamentally, I do not believe in arbitrarily deciding who can and can not have access to information though.

        • dill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I completely agree - I personally love that there’s so many Open Source AI tools out there.

          The scary part is (similar to what we experienced with DeepSeek’s web interface) that its extremely easy for these corporations to manipulate, or censor information.

          I should have clarified my concern - I believe we need to revisit critical thinking as a society (whole other topic) and especially so when it comes to tools like this.

          Ensuring everyone using it, is aware of what it does, its flaws, how to process its output, and its potential for abuse. Similar to internet safety training for kids in the mid-2000s.