ekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 18 hours agoWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up11Karrow-down115
arrow-up1988arrow-down1imageWhat Refutes Science...lemmy.worldekZepp@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 hours agoCounterexamples only go so far. What you really need is counterexamples, and an analysis of their implications, including a probability study. In other words, well, science.
minus-squareRemember_the_tooth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours agoBecause of the implication.
Counterexamples only go so far. What you really need is counterexamples, and an analysis of their implications, including a probability study.
In other words, well, science.
Because of the implication.