• RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Meta also allegedly modified settings “so that the smallest amount of seeding possible could occur,”

    Big tech taking without giving back to the community once again.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I think this is still going to be a net benefit to us, though. Meta may not have contributed much bandwidth, which is leeching in the short term, but in the long term they’re now forced to contribute something much more important; lawyer power. Meta is going to have to fight to defend piracy.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Well, yes, why would you believe something without seeing it? But given how litigious the publishing industry is about this kind of thing I don’t see it as likely that they wouldn’t fight.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You think Meta will just roll over and hand out whatever penalties the publishers demand of them?

          Meta isn’t going to be defending us. It’s going to be defending itself. Because it is now one of us.

          • brisk@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Secret out-of-court settlement is an option.

            Also known as “bribing your way out of the law”

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              They’ll compare the amount the publishers are demanding against how much it would cost them to lawyer up to prevent that and any future payments. Meta’s heavyweight enough that they can use “lobbying their way out of the law, aka changing the law so that they’re not violating it at all” as a strategy.

              If they do simply pay the publishers off, oh well, at least it’s just the status quo. But I don’t see a reason to assume that’s the way this is going to go. Other countries have already carved explicit exceptions to copyright for AI training, Meta would be in favor of that kind of thing.