- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The US potato industry brings in US$240 million annually, and demand for taters in all their wonderful processed shapes and sizes is year-round. As such, a certain amount of stock in season is sent to cold storage to supply the demand. However, thanks to a normal biological function in the root vegetable, low temperatures trigger a mechanism that converts starches to sugars. When processed, these tubers that have experienced cold-induced sweetening (CIS) appear darker when cooked.
Unfortunately, it’s more than potato-skin deep, as this darkened chip is a crispy red flag – it indicates elevated levels of acrylamide, a chemical that has been associated with increased cancer risk due to its carcinogenic properties.
I’m sorry, but this is wrong.
Acrylamide is classified as “probable carcinogens”. Not as a “known carcinogen”.
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/risk-prevention/understanding-cancer-risk/known-and-probable-human-carcinogens.html
The thing is more studies should be done. Even a probable should be enough to trigger that but it is to big business. Below more classifications:
But non of these classify it as a “known carcinogen” like your title claims. Acording to rule 1, posts must be facts.
So chemical that has been associated with increased cancer risk due to its carcinogenic properties?
There is probably less cumbersome way to put it, but you shouldn’t use “known carcinogen” since that is an official (or at least widely used) classifcation that the chemical is NOT in.
til chips contain a chemical that has carcinogenic properties, acrylamide ?