erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agogender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1840arrow-down112 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1828arrow-down1imagegender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square54fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareRachelhazideas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down1·1 month agoMake the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agobut could female humans be called femaleman?
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoThat’s more or less what it historically was
minus-squareBorgDrone@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoOr just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
but could female humans be called femaleman?
That’s more or less what it historically was
Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.