• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    need time on the target to transfer enough power to damage the target.

    I dont think its much of an issue at this point. A 2-3 seconds pulse should be more than enough to bring a consumer drone down.

    Interesting showcase of a US weapon system used for this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFiDYFnlp7s If they showcase this, then its probably outdated already and the current version is even better.

    • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      2-3 seconds to destroy is tracking the target an additional 400 feet (if they travel at 100mph, they’re too small to go very fast). I was basing my response based on that. If they decreased the time to half that, it would be significantly more effective.

      If you send swarms of the UAVs say 16 - it would take one turret 48 seconds of fire time - probably more like a minute switching between targets, but that seems extremely fast. That means that the longest living UAV made it an additional mile and a half.

      Of course the more you field, the more likely they are to reach their target. Which is true regardless of the kill vehicle being energy or kinetic.

      In any case, it should be far cheaper to take down a drone, and more successful even without a better kill time.