CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agoDeepSeek might not be as disruptive as claimed, firm reportedly has 50,000 Nvidia GPUs and spent $1.6 billion on buildoutswww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down114cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up124arrow-down1external-linkDeepSeek might not be as disruptive as claimed, firm reportedly has 50,000 Nvidia GPUs and spent $1.6 billion on buildoutswww.tomshardware.comCharlesDarwin@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agomessage-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareCharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·12 hours agoHuh, well imagine that. The truth is more complicated than the initial hype.
minus-squarefallowseed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down2·12 hours agodoesn’t that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P
minus-squareCharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·12 hours agoI guess. Although Meta does the same, and I’m not sure of the motivations.
minus-squareCameronDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·12 hours agoUnless their goal was shorting the affected tech stocks. They were a financial firm originally right?
Huh, well imagine that. The truth is more complicated than the initial hype.
doesn’t that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P
I guess. Although Meta does the same, and I’m not sure of the motivations.
Unless their goal was shorting the affected tech stocks. They were a financial firm originally right?