Thousands of highly cited scientists have at least one retraction

www.nature.com

cross-posted to:
[email protected]

Thousands of highly cited scientists have at least one retraction

www.nature.com

paywall@rss.ponder.catMB to

Nature@rss.ponder.catEnglish · 1 month ago

cross-posted to:
[email protected]

Database shows that researchers with retracted papers had higher self-citation rates and published more than those without retractions.

You must log in or register to comment.

Chat

Nature@rss.ponder.cat

nature@rss.ponder.cat

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Community locked: only moderators can create posts. You can still comment on posts.

Nature is a weekly international journal publishing the finest peer-reviewed research in all fields of science and technology on the basis of its originality, importance, interdisciplinary interest, timeliness, accessibility, elegance and surprising conclusions. Nature also provides rapid, authoritative, insightful and arresting news and interpretation of topical and coming trends affecting science, scientists and the wider public.

Don’t post archive.is links or full text of articles, you will receive a temp ban.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

9 users / day
137 users / week
293 users / month
885 users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
91 subscribers
2.78K Posts
174 Comments
Modlog