Andromeda@beehaw.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agoSouth Afrulecabeehaw.orgimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1230arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1230arrow-down1imageSouth Afrulecabeehaw.orgAndromeda@beehaw.org to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareCatt@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-24 days agoNope, the text is correct. not (x or y) <=> (not x) and (not y) not (x and y) <=> (not x) or (not y) Edit: The parenthesis on the right side if the equivalence are only there to make it easier to read. Without those, the expression would be the same in this case
minus-squareScreamingFirehawk@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 days agoAh yeah, the English is confusing written how it is in the post, I needed the parentheses for it to make sense
Nope, the text is correct.
Edit: The parenthesis on the right side if the equivalence are only there to make it easier to read. Without those, the expression would be the same in this case
Ah yeah, the English is confusing written how it is in the post, I needed the parentheses for it to make sense