Twenty-nine percent of non-voters who supported Biden in 2020 said U.S. support for the genocide was the top reason they sat the 2024 election, according to a survey by YouGov.
Twenty-nine percent of non-voters who supported Biden in 2020 said U.S. support for the genocide was the top reason they sat the 2024 election, according to a survey by YouGov.
How could the dems know that genocide is unpopular??! What’s next, are you going to tell me canceling all student debt would have been popular? Throwing Trump in prison? Rescheduling cannabis? Not campaigning on building the wall and closing the border?
It’s not disinformation and it’s hardly specific to social media.
Democrats falling for republican’s saying they’re soft on crime when they unilaterally defund schools to fund the police, that they’ve opened the borders when they deport more immigrants than the republican administrations, that they’re weak on foreign policy even while they’re bombing half a dozen countries, etc goes back to Clinton.
Every single time the dems act like they’re going to get the mythical moderate republican vote or a pat on the head or something if they just do the abhorrent shit the republicans are accusing them of not doing, and every time they fall for it.
In heavily Arab-American areas of Michigan, where disfavor with Biden’s handling with the war is at its highest, purportedly pro-Israel billboards have for weeks trumpeted Harris’s commitment to Israel and featured her Jewish husband Doug Emhoff; online ads with the same message have also targeted these constituencies. Meanwhile, the same PAC has also funded mailers sent to Jewish households in Pennsylvania declaring that Harris not pro-Israel enough.
The above article also discusses how this was not merely the effort of one PAC, but that multiple PACs were engaged in this sort of disinformation.
However - I think I understand what you mean, and Harris should have immediately broken with Biden on Palestine. Make no mistake, I’m not thinking of this as some sort of dispassionate politics-as-baseball strategy.
The right thing to do was and always will be to stop a genocide.
Imagine throwing an election because you love genocide too much.
How could the dems know that genocide is unpopular??! What’s next, are you going to tell me canceling all student debt would have been popular? Throwing Trump in prison? Rescheduling cannabis? Not campaigning on building the wall and closing the border?
It’s amazing that she was in bed with Israel according to pro Palestinians and in bed with Hamas according to pro Israeli.
We all have been played through social media algorithms, and it didn’t really matter what stance she had or would have.
Disinformation was so amazingly orchestrated that people on both sides of any issue hated her.
It’s not disinformation and it’s hardly specific to social media.
Democrats falling for republican’s saying they’re soft on crime when they unilaterally defund schools to fund the police, that they’ve opened the borders when they deport more immigrants than the republican administrations, that they’re weak on foreign policy even while they’re bombing half a dozen countries, etc goes back to Clinton.
Every single time the dems act like they’re going to get the mythical moderate republican vote or a pat on the head or something if they just do the abhorrent shit the republicans are accusing them of not doing, and every time they fall for it.
I think specifically they are referencing this:
Pro-Trump PACs back more misleading ads about Harris and Israel in final bid for swing-state voters - Jewish Telegraphic Agency
The above article also discusses how this was not merely the effort of one PAC, but that multiple PACs were engaged in this sort of disinformation.
However - I think I understand what you mean, and Harris should have immediately broken with Biden on Palestine. Make no mistake, I’m not thinking of this as some sort of dispassionate politics-as-baseball strategy.
The right thing to do was and always will be to stop a genocide.