• moody@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Also it’s 100k hours combined use over 50 printers at once, not one printer for 100k hours, which would likely be much more problematic.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That’s some serious click baiting. Naturally you can’t run a printer for more than 8760 hrs each year, so 100k is definitely of a hint. But then at least try for 12 printers instead

    • Atlusb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Correct but it does show their manufacturing is fairly reliable. I’m not for them for their attitude rather than their quality.