Summary

Fable, a social media app focused on books, faced backlash for its AI-generated 2024 reading summaries containing offensive and biased commentary, like labeling a user a “diversity devotee” or urging another to “surface for the occasional white author.”

The feature, powered by OpenAI’s API, was intended to be playful and fun. However, some of the summaries took on an oddly combative tone, making inappropriate comments on users’ diversity and sexual orientation.

Fable apologized, disabled the feature, and removed other AI tools.

Critics argue the response was insufficient, highlighting broader issues of bias in generative AI and the need for better safeguards.

  • GreyEyedGhost
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Part of it is the idea of punching down. Making fun of the majority/norm for sticking with typical behavior is safe, making fun of targeted groups isn’t okay.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      This was supposed to be about reading habits. In that context talking about “hey throw in a (different colour) author too” doesn’t seem much like punching down

      • GreyEyedGhost
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        So, if I read 80% female authors, from Indian, Chinese, African, African American, Japanese, Korean, Australian Aboriginal, Polynesian, and indigenous from North, Central, and South America, the suggestion I’m not diverse enough is okay? Not to mention that, if you’re speaking English, if not the majority then a disproportionate minority is going to be white men. And there’s the point. Your very statement implies there are only two groups, white authors and not white authors, which would be a lot more obvious if you hadn’t replaced “white” with “(different colour)”. So what was your reason for doing that, particularly in the context of punching up/down?

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          If you read mostly women then it could “roast” you by saying something along the line if a fella couldn’t catch a break. If it was mostly men, same joke but other way around. Simple, really. Find a habit, make a joke about it.

          And there’s the point. Your very statement implies there are only two groups, white authors and not white authors, which would be a lot more obvious if you hadn’t replaced “white” with “(different colour)”.

          Uhmm I was including white authors in that. If you are reading mostly white authors, you could suggest throwing in an author of some other colour. If you were reading just black authors, could joke about some other colour, including white.

          • GreyEyedGhost
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ah, okay, so you don’t understand the concept of punching up/down. Also, if you’re roast includes primarily low-hanging fruit, it isn’t going to be well-received, either.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s a lighthearted joke about someone’s reading habits. It’s a pretty funny to get a roast and be upset that it’s about stuff you do. What else would it be lol

              • GreyEyedGhost
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 days ago

                Yes, we’ve already established you don’t understand the concept of punching up/down. We don’t need to belabour the point.