• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    You can’t even truly read what’s inside of an SSL packet. They probably want to fuck with the routes around torrent trackers.

    There are always ways around, tor, retro share, i2p. I kind of wish we’d find a harder to track version of torrent.

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Torrents are already very hard to block. You don’t actually need a tracker, because all modern torrent clients support DHT (distributed hash table). You only need some way to get the initial hash for a torrent, so that’s where trackers are still useful, but once you’re connected to the swarm, you can only be blocked if the entire swarm is blocked.

      Tracking though… It’s too easy to get IP addresses for the entire swarm and I don’t see how you could ever fix that. Tor doesn’t really solve that issue either, it just moves it to places where you won’t get in legal trouble or to people who don’t mind getting in legal trouble, a bit like VPN providers.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I wonder what the legality would be of seeding the binary difference between the wikipedia.zim and a copy of the wild robot. But I digress… We could probably bolt on something I2P like to torrent, have everything pass through multiple nodes. I fear the best we could ever work out would be plausible deniability.