I’ve only just finished part one, so there’s room for growth of course.

But, it feels like the author puts in grotesqueness at least once every chapter for no reason. For example, when the priest gets pushed over then kicked in the asshole so he shits his pants (and for those who haven’t read, I do not mean he gets his ass kicked, I meant literally foot to asshole then shit comes out) and that’s all that happens to him. He was then carried off to safety with no further injury. Why even write that. Sure, it could be some odd metaphor about how he’s dirty just like everyone else but there are about a dozen better ways to get that across, surely.

I’m failing to see how such a crass book became an LGTBQ+ powerhouse of a musical. Surely there were other stories with similar narratives and less babies sniffing piss, right?

I suppose I don’t want an actual explanation. I’m more ranting, but I’d be interested to hear others’ thoughts

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 hours ago

    No idea. I actually saw the musical first and the read the book. “Crass” is the perfect word for it. I would have never connected the two outside of it being about the Wicked Witch. I’m glad that it was changed, because the book felt like it was written by an edge lord.