• TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The pain is coherent. They blame politicians which is correct. But they fail to see it’s the system that perpetuates the problems. Then project their misery on minority groups and the disadvantaged. Oliver sings-

    “So they think you don’t know. But I think that you do.”

    But they don’t. And that’s the problem.

    • But I said a bunch of stupid uniformed shit about politics on Facebook even though I have no education or experience in policy or law, and got a bunch of likes!

      That’s the same as being an expert! /s

      Dunning-Kruger needs an update to account for social media. Like, above the “peak of Mt. Stupid” there is a “summit of dumbasses” who get all their validation and education from social media engagement.

    • psychothumbs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The whole thing with mysterious producers approaching him out of nowhere when he’s at his lowest point to get him to record a faux-populist song that really reinforces conservative power is very Black Mirror.

  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Calling it Populism is already giving them ground. It’s Fake Populism. It’s manufactured and funded by the elite class, rather than advocated for and created by the working class.

    • shadowspirit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fake populism. What a bullshit statement. Populism is populism. The message either resonates or doesn’t. The fact that we’re discussing it suggests that it resonates. So what do we do about it? To agree with your argument is the reason why Trump became president. As a society we cannot discount discontent regardless of the ideology. There are a lot of pissed off people on this planet for various reasons. If the song or message didn’t resonate we wouldn’t be talking about it so it’s not fake. A rich man paid for a poor man song. So who is the sucker? The person who believes it or the person who argues against it? It is what it is but it’s not fake if you hold an opinion and that’s the point.

      I heard the song and like the beat and now I’m reading a thread where I feel like a bad person for enjoying a song for just being a song. Was in a thread earlier today about Sherman and the civil war. Has there ever been a war fought by the rich man on behalf of the poor man? The answer is no. At the extreme the question is are we willing to die for our beliefs?

      There is a large swathe of people who are disenfranchised maybe we should care. The root cause is what is important but we often fall into debates about ideology without addressing the systemic issues.

      My opinion is we have far more in common with the people around us than we care to or are capable of realizing. We all struggle so it’s important to first empathize and then determine from what root these opinions are derived. Granted, some are fake but many are genuine.

      EDIT: sorry, realize this became a wall of text and I’m half drunk and half-baked but I hope I made a coherent argument for both sides. If the discourse is civil it’s a healthy conversation to have and an argument worth having. The problem with "mainstream media " is that debate never actually happens it’s always cultivated in these types of forms allow us to have healthy conversations and disagreements. Have a good evening folks.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    An excellent take-down of the song’s philosophical underpinnings.

    I disagree with the author’s skepticism about how this went viral though. As other commenters have indicated, it feels like the release was a little too well coordinated for some random YouTuber.

    • Total astroturfing.

      The right wingers all have daily emails and faxes of talking points, memes, videos, posts, and whatever the outrage of the day is, and they share the shit in unison. That’s their MO.

      The memo went out: “co-tweet links to this song.” Suddenly it was everywhere.

      Then they pretend is not astroturfed.

    • AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to the Citations Needed podcast, it was an obscure video that was plucked up by a rightwing organization and promoted to be in everyone’s feeds

  • sporangepeeler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The title of the song is what got me. I immediately thought of Richmond’s history as the capitol of the Confederacy.

  • shadowspirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A friend shared the music with me and right off the rip I thought the song was a banger. It immediately fills a void left open by modern country. I didn’t read into it nearly as much as some folks here are . .which is somewhat puzzling to me. It’s country music it’s always going to be a woe is me story. I’ll listen to the words more closely next time.

    I’m new to Lemmy so I’m not sure yet how to tag users but Bee is getting beat up a bit in this thread. I think part of the reason why this is getting so much traction is because it is good music. The debate is the message. Misplaced frustration isn’t uncommon regardless of political belief. I think where exception is to be taken is when it pushes or promotes violence. The same debate was had about gangster rap and other forms of music years ago.