• cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Unless the drive gets corrupted or infected with malware, you can just load a previous snapshot. That’s much faster and easier than reinstalling.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Snapshot as in a VM?

      Most people run their OS on physical hardware.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You can run your desktop inside of a VM with the GPU and USB PCIe devices passed though.

        However, I think they are talking about btrfs

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Ah, yeah, I have read about that, I do feel a bir hesitant to use BTRFS so I didn’t think about that.

          The Linux machines I have worked with all ran ext3/4 or xfs.

          To be completely fair, I never gave BTRFS a proper chance, at first because it felt too new and unstable when I heard about it, and later I heard that it was developed by Facebook and let my distaste for that company color my perceptions of btrfs.

          But I just checked the wikipedia article and saw that plenty of reputable oranizations have worked on btrfs, so I guess I’ll get it a go when I build a NAS…

          Thanks for reminding me of it, I may get set in my ways from time to time but I do genuinely try to learn and change my way of thinking.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I wouldn’t use it for a NAS. You want ZFS for that.

            Btrfs is good for small setups with either single or dual disks.