Neuromancer@lemm.eeM to Conservative@lemm.ee · 4 days agoTrump wins 15 millionwww.cnn.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down126cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1-19arrow-down1external-linkTrump wins 15 millionwww.cnn.comNeuromancer@lemm.eeM to Conservative@lemm.ee · 4 days agomessage-square23fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eeOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down7·4 days agoThey know they couldn’t prove criminal rape. Considering she doesn’t even know the year, there is no evidence, etc. it’s an impossible task. As such they funded a civil lawsuit after they changed the laws to allow it. If anything you should find it concerning that anyone could say they were raped by another person with no proof and get Millions in dollars. If you haven’t read on the case, you should. The amount of bullshit they had to do is amazing
minus-squareBaggins [he/him]linkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·4 days agoI guess he shouldn’t have raped her then.
minus-squareNeuromancer@lemm.eeOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down8·4 days agoNo evidence he did. Why they are paying 15 million dollars for saying it. It’s a false statement since if it was true, they wouldn’t pay anything
They know they couldn’t prove criminal rape. Considering she doesn’t even know the year, there is no evidence, etc. it’s an impossible task.
As such they funded a civil lawsuit after they changed the laws to allow it.
If anything you should find it concerning that anyone could say they were raped by another person with no proof and get Millions in dollars.
If you haven’t read on the case, you should. The amount of bullshit they had to do is amazing
I guess he shouldn’t have raped her then.
No evidence he did. Why they are paying 15 million dollars for saying it. It’s a false statement since if it was true, they wouldn’t pay anything
deleted by creator