Summary

Donald Trump is considering privatizing the US Postal Service due to its financial losses, a move that could disrupt shipping and push hundreds of thousands of federal workers out of government.

Citing the USPS’s financial losses, Trump argued the agency should not rely on government subsidies.

While his specific privatization plans remain unclear, Trump previously clashed with the USPS during his first term, attempting to shift control of key functions like labor relations and rate-setting to the Treasury Department.

This move could significantly alter the structure and operations of the USPS if implemented.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    191
    ·
    3 days ago

    the conservative push to destroy this incredibly successful organization continues. its already been punished more than any other entity by requiring things no other business anywhere is required to.

    starve the beast. theyve forced it to make financial considerations that now put it in pretend financial trouble so they can point at it as a failure.

    if the USPS was allowed to run as any other business today it would be far more successful on paper than it already is, but conservatives just cant live with that.

    • lewdian69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      108
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Good thing the Democratic administration replaced DeJoy and passed some protections while they were in charge… oh. wait

        • electricyarn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          There were empty seats on the board that would have tipped the balance, sitting vacant for the entirety of Biden’s term.

          • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 days ago

            Not to excuse Biden, because he has fucked up on multiple fronts, but aren’t those appointments dependent on Senate confirmations and thus sitting mostly empty under Obama, which let the Cheeto Bandito take over in the first place? And IDK if the Senate would have confirmed any Biden nominees. Wouldn’t have hurt to try though.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Biden appointed, and the Senate confirmed, enough postal board members to get rid of DeJoy if Biden wanted.

              But DeJoy is still there, and it’s 1000% because Biden did not want to get rid of him.

    • adarza
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      3 days ago

      it shouldn’t have to be ‘profitable’ in the first place.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It was never intended to be. That’s why it has the word “service” right there in its name.

        The USPS spent $89.5 billion in operations this year, which means that even if they didn’t collect a single dime from anybody they could serve everyone in the country with every package and letter that they already did in the entirety of 2024 for about 4.475% of the Defense Department’s expenditures in that same time frame – which are just under two trillion dollars.

        The Defense Department as a whole Hoovers up about 24% the Federal budget.

        Therefore the fact that the conservatives have successfully bamboozled everyone into believing that the USPS should be run as a “business” in the first place is incredible. Would you support about 0.1 percent of your Federal taxes spent on granting you free Postal Service access forever? I probably would.

        • Knoxvomica
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Wait, is it possible to run national defense as a business that’s for profit? I mean if we all have to live in a capitalist shit hole anyways why not go for broke?

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      We’re watching in real time what we’ve criticized other generations for letting things happen. Wars, electric transportation, malls for developers, Citizen United, etc., etc.,

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Success is measured in how many billionaires it makes. I don’t see the USPS making any billionaires. /s