I’m probably one of the few people still using a Pebble smart watch (still alive and kicking with Rebble!), and I’ve just gone through the app store and found a few cool apps that still work. Given that you have to give the Pebble android app quite a few permissions to be able to do its thing I’m now wondering if all the third-party apps can also access all those permissions. They’re mostly little FOSS one-person projects so I can probably have a nose through the source myself to check for dodgy behaviour, but does anyone know what the risks are in general?

  • bug@lemmy.oneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I just deny the Pebble/Rebble app network permissions will that achieve a similar result?

    • mranderson17@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably? Though I have no experience with the rebble app. I don’t think any of it’s features like searching for apps, weather, etc will work properly and some android apps really misbehave when you take away permissions that they expect to have. Try it and let us know! =]

      • kugiyasan@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can confirm, I’m running Android 13, and whenever I remove notifications permissions to the pebble app, it somehow gets them back by itself and I have that annoyed “connecting” notification opened all the time 🤡

      • bug@lemmy.oneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        OK, so after a few days of denying the pebble app network privileges everything seems to be working fine! Obviously I can’t access the app store now but I can just temporarily reactivate network if I want to download something new. I don’t really use any apps that need network (in the pebble’s old age I’d rather it take it easy and save battery and let the much newer phone run the things I need to run!) so there’s no real loss for my use case.

        • mranderson17@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nice, honestly this sounds like the perfect use case for Gadgetbridge which is a much newer and actively developed tool in addition to not requiring network access. But your solution works fine and I’m sure it’s less work if it’s what you were already doing anyway rather than migrating to a new app. Glad it’s working for you.

          • bug@lemmy.oneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I tried out gadgetbridge too, seemed largely functional though I did notice the Bluetooth drop. Also it apparently uses old Bluetooth rather then BTLE? I’ll stick with Rebble for now but it’s good to know there’s a decent replacement when it eventually packs in!