• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    277 people… over 25 years. It’s statistically insignificant on a population of 300 million people.

    By point of comparison:

    https://www.cpsc.gov/Newsroom/News-Releases/2023/Nearly-Half-of-Incidents-with-Kids-and-Corded-Window-Coverings-Resulted-in-Death-GoCordless-to-Save-Lives

    “On average, about nine children under 5 years of age die every year from strangling in window blinds, shades, draperies and other window coverings with cords.”

    So 225 over 25 years. Again, not statistically significant.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      A child dying from something that could have been prevented cannot be dismissed as a simple statistical insignificance. That’s the most cynical thing I’ve heard in a while.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Individual tragedies are never going to be prevented. You might as well mandate kids exist in giant hamster balls 24/7.

        Oh, but then they might suffocate.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s perfectly preventable in other countries. In the western world, this is pretty much a uniquely American experience.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            You can’t undo the 2nd amendment, there are over 400 million guns in the country.

            The fact that there are only 11 deaths per year on a population of 400 million guns shows just how insignificant the problem is.

            It’s not even a “1 in a million” kind of thing.

            It’s a 1 in 36 million kind of thing.

            • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              It seems Trump has no problem advocating for undoing the 14th Amendment to ban birthright citizenship. If he does that, I see no problem undoing the 2nd Amendment.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Yeah, no amendment can be undone in the current climate.

                Doing it requires a 290 votes in the House, a body that last needed 15 tries to get a 218 vote simple majority to decide who their own leader will be.

                Then you need a 67 vote majority in the Senate, a body that’s blocked from doing anything by a 60 vote majority to break a filibuster.

                If by some miracle, both of those things happen, then the change needs to be ratified by 38 states.

                In the last election, Trump won 31 states, so he’d need 7 Harris states to back him on repealing an amendment. Aint happening.

          • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            We should ban seat belts, then. Theres a non-zero chance that they could trap you in a car in a crash leading to your death. Never mind that the chance is statistically insignificant.

            Also, do other countries mandate this safety feature?

            • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Seat belts are designed specifically to save people’s lives. In action, they prevent a lot more deaths than they cause. Firearms are designed specifically to take people’s lives. In action, they cause a lot more deaths than they prevent.