Summary

Euthanasia accounted for 4.7% of deaths in Canada in 2023, with 15,300 people opting for assisted dying—a 16% increase, though slower than prior years.

Most recipients had terminal illnesses, primarily cancer, and 96% were white, sparking questions about disparities.

Quebec, at 37% of cases, remains Canada’s euthanasia hotspot.

Since legalizing assisted dying in 2016, Canada has expanded access, now covering chronic conditions and planning to include mental illnesses by 2027.

Critics, citing rapid growth and controversial cases, warn of insufficient safeguards, while proponents highlight strict eligibility criteria. Debate continues globally.

  • cygnus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Eugenics is completely different — in fact, it’s the polar opposite of MAID. Conflating the two is like arguing that rape and sex are the same thing.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I’m not comparing eugenics with euthanasia. I’m comparing the perception of what “progressive” meant back then to right now.

      The point I’m trying to make is that just because something is considered progressive today does not mean it won’t be considered barbaric tomorrow. This is why I don’t immediately support something just because it appears to have a veneer of idealism. I think it through carefully.

      • cygnus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I’m not comparing eugenics with euthanasia. I’m comparing the perception of what “progressive” meant back then to right now.

        … by comparing eugenics and MAID. There are lots of things that were considered progressive back then (e.g. workers’ rights) that are still considered progressive today. Why did you specifically pick eugenics as an example only to then say it isn’t like MAID?

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          … by comparing eugenics and MAID

          Definition of compare: To consider or describe as similar, equal, or analogous; liken.

          Nowhere did I say eugenics is similar, equal or analogous to euthanasia. You can go ahead and read the comments again, you won’t find it.

          What we are comparing is the societal perception of eugenics in the early 1900s and the perception of euthanasia now.

          Why did you specifically pick eugenics as an example only to then say it isn’t like MAID?

          To make the point that just because something seems progressive on its face doesn’t necessarily mean it will stand the test of time. It is an example. I think it’s a good example because of how relatively horrible eugenics seems today relative to how positively it was seen in the past. Perhaps you could find other examples, I’d be happy to hear them.

          All I’m saying about euthanasia/assisted suicide/whatever acronym you wanna give it- is that it must be judged on its own merits outside of groupthink. That’s what I’m attempting to do here, discuss the idea on its own merits. I think that’s what you actually have an issue with, not the feigned pearl clutching about some comparison.

          • cygnus
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Nowhere did I say eugenics is similar, equal or analogous to euthanasia. You can go ahead and read the comments again, you won’t find it.

            Then why bring it up? Why don’t we discuss your favourite chicken soup recipe while we’re at it?

            it must be judged on its own merits outside of groupthink

            “Groupthink” is to presume we’d have the right to deny them agency over their person. MAID is the ultimate expression of bodily autonomy.

            That’s what I’m attempting to do here, discuss the idea on its own merits.

            Except you are not. You haven’t actually discussed MAID itself other than saying it generally makes you feel icky. What you have talked about at length is eugenics, despite your claim that eugenics are irrelevant to the topic at hand. Can you explain why you’re against MAID without referring to eugenics or any other historical issue?