• Theo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    There can’t be a Minecraft 2. That is just Minecraft today. Each update builds on the last. A second version of the game would be redundant.

    • Halasham@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      Eh, the same could probably be said of RuneScape but they tried revolutionizing the game and it alienated enough people that as a reaction they started a second game using old code from years before the update that split the community.

      Now there’s RuneScape 3 and Old School RuneScape… and Old School has the larger community.

      • Theo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        But it’s not broken so don’t fix it. [Minecraft]. They can fix bugs and game mechanics etc with updates. Almost anything can be changed, fixed or improved with that alone. If they make Minecraft 2, it would have to be completely different. Like MC story mode was a completely different game.

        • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          But OP wants to “revolutionize” Minecraft, so Minecraft 2 being “completely different” wouldn’t be a negative.

          • Theo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            It ain’t broke don’t fix it. I would have to be a “conservative” on the MC category here.

            • Nziom@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              You mean 1.8 Java concervative? Or 1.7 Java concervative or 0.14.0 MCPE concervative

        • Halasham@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          RuneScape 3 (RS3) wasn’t broken when Old School RuneScape (OSRS) was first announced or brought online either. It’s not doing well now, possibly to the point it’d be fair to call it broken, but that’s more of a slow decline over years that didn’t happen to OSRS.

          A big part of why OSRS was created was because a lot of people didn’t like the ‘revolutionary’ changes made to RS3 and didn’t like the direction the game was going in. A big part of why it’s still around and now more popular than RS3 is because it’s treated differently by Jagex and its community.