Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 hours agoHelp us pleaselemmy.worldimagemessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up1445arrow-down191
arrow-up1354arrow-down1imageHelp us pleaselemmy.worldDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 hours agomessage-square104fedilink
minus-squareinvalid_name@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down5·5 hours agoNo. Nobody voted against ranked choice voting; it was never allowed to be an option.
minus-squareMontagge@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·5 hours agoNo, it was definitely voted down in my state
minus-squareinvalid_name@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·5 hours agoOh c…well at least it got that far. Its not like electoralism can get us out of this anyway.
minus-squarePhilipTheBucket@ponder.catlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 hours agoIt was on the ballot in well over 10% of jurisdictions, this past year. People voted it down.
minus-squareinvalid_name@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·28 minutes agoWell shit. I guess electoralism is never gonna be democracy.
No. Nobody voted against ranked choice voting; it was never allowed to be an option.
No, it was definitely voted down in my state
Oh c…well at least it got that far.
Its not like electoralism can get us out of this anyway.
It was on the ballot in well over 10% of jurisdictions, this past year. People voted it down.
Well shit. I guess electoralism is never gonna be democracy.