• ssladam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t agree. The dnc opted to go with a strategy of, “we don’t need to listen to the will of the voters, and we’ll double down on doing the same gd thing we’ve always done, you either get on board, or bad-man wins!”

    People want change. DNC refused to make even the hint of willingness to change, it’s no surprise they lost so many voters.

    This was entirely avoidable.

    My only hope is that the DNC will finally wake the fuck up and introduce an actual progressive platform. But shit, I said the same thing when Hillary tanked. So why would it be different now?

    • mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      Disagree.

      He is such a shithead they should have been able to run a piece of timber against him and still won. The best candidate is any other candidate.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      41 minutes ago

      Unpopular opinion: I would vote that all people who don’t vote are first in line to be drafted with last pick on positions, aka front lines. It would help us to get people to actually care about voting.

      Shoot, they are kicking 15,000 trans people out? Guess they should auto fill their ranks back up with non voters.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      People want change.

      Nah, Americans want cheap groceries and they’re willing to kill the world for it because they don’t understand that the President doesn’t control prices of eggs.

      actual progressive platform

      Compare Harris’ policy with Biden’s and Clinton’s.