Summary

Two transgender women, Dahlia and Jess, were attacked at a Minneapolis rail station, with onlookers cheering their assailants instead of helping.

After confronting a man yelling transphobic slurs, the situation escalated into a violent assault involving four or five others, leaving both women unconscious.

Advocates attribute the rise in anti-trans violence to emboldened transphobia fueled by misinformation and political rhetoric, including Donald Trump’s anti-LGBTQ+ policies.

The local trans community is responding with solidarity rallies, self-defense classes, and firearm training to prepare for a potential increase in attacks.

Police are investigating, but no arrests have been made.

  • hope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It sounds like you’re just trying to be contrarian? Do you have any reason whatsoever to not believe the article? I understand doubting the article, but it seems you’ve just decided that it is exactly the opposite of the truth, which I don’t get.

    • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The reason is that the ‘journalist’ uses intense emotional language to highlight only one side of the story, while completely glossing over the fact that their ‘victim’ literally knocked someone out with a weapon. Any rational person ought to at least raise an eyebrow while they consider what could have provoked bystanders to jump in, when presented with that fact.

      It’s really obvious rage bait.

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Jess asked him to stop talking to them that way, prompting the man to “sucker punch” her. Dahlia then struck the man with her cane, Muhm said.

        She was attacked and then defended herself.

        You don’t believe trans women should be able to defend themselves? Or don’t believe in self defense more generally?

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        What emotional lanuage do you mean, “sucker punched” maybe? Thats a pretty damn neutral recounting, come tf on.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Turns out that describing hate crimes objectively inherently uses “leading language” since it’s a societal problem that only bigots don’t mind.

            And thinking that The Independent, a well-respected broadsheet, is a tabloid is quite indicative of exactly how much you know about anything you’re talking about 🙄