Summary

The UK has introduced the Tobacco and Vapes Bill, aiming to make it illegal for future generations to buy cigarettes. The bill proposes gradually raising the minimum smoking age, so those born after January 1, 2009, will never be able to purchase tobacco legally.

It also includes restrictions on vape flavors and packaging to prevent youth addiction and bans smoking in certain outdoor spaces, though pub beer gardens are exempt.

Supported by the Labour Party’s majority, the legislation seeks to create a “smoke-free U.K.” and combat smoking-related deaths.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Pushing an entire business into black market over time… Who in their right mind approved this?

    • PlasticLove@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Won’t somebody think of the poor struggling businesses.

      Where would society be without those good old death stick sellers who hid decades of research into health risks and marketed to children. Cornerstone of society and they’re trying to ban it? Savages.

      • john89
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Are you stupid? It’s not about the “businesses” and their well-being. It’s about the effect that black markets have on society.

        People are going to get their drugs whether they’re legal or not. If you paid attention in history class and reality, you’d know that prohibition and the war on drugs does not solve the issue.

        • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It’ll work for the majority of people. You won’t be able to do it out in public.

          If you want to get cancer in your own house go ahead.

          The truth is they put a huge burden on public services. Mainly the health service but also they create insane amounts of litter.

          If vaping is still an option then most people will just do that.

          • john89
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The truth is they put a huge burden on public services.

            Do they? If so, you must be in favor of banning smoking anything, right?

            they create insane amounts of litter.

            Do they? If so, it sounds like there needs to be harsher penalties and greater enforcement for litter laws!

          • Feyd@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            14 hours ago

            If you want to get cancer in your own house go ahead.

            I agree with the sentiment of both you and the person I originally applied to. Smoking is a blight and I wish it would go away. I simply don’t think prohibition is the way to do it.

            Mainly the health service but also they create insane amounts of litter

            Vaping also creates an insane amount of litter. I wish vaping would go away just as much as I do cigarettes.

            • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              Yeah vaping will have its time. I bet they’re already sitting on evidence that it fucks you up.

              Prohibition does work very well for kids though. Most people start young as when you’re older you know the issues.

              So they are keeping it for people already exposed and trying to stop younger people starting in the first place.

              They raised the age to 18 when I turned 16 and it dramatically cut the amount we had access to.

              It’s not like the old alcohol probation. Plus smoking isn’t even fun like drinking. It’s just gross and bad for your health. And most people don’t drink because of addiction. It’s a different kettle of fish.

              But they should be doing the same for vaping.

              • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                It’s not a secret. Ask any medical professional and they’ll tell you about popcorn lung. Vaping is worse in many ways. Look, don’t suck non “air” into your lungs. Pollution is bad enough for us. We don’t need to make it worse.

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Exactly. Smoking was dying off due to vaping until all these countries got a stick up their ass over it and decided to either outright ban vapes or put ridiculous regulations on them. This is why everyone uses disposables in the US now and toss their lithium batteries in the trash every couple days.

      • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        16 hours ago

        vaping was much worse because people blatantly use them indoors and wherever else they shouldn’t. And due to them not needing to light up they just constantly puff on them between every three breaths. It’s fucking awful being in a queue or walking behind someone vaping.

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Supported by the Labour Party’s majority, the legislation seeks to create a “smoke-free U.K.” and combat smoking-related deaths.

          vaping was much worse

          Why?

          because people blatantly use them indoors and wherever else they shouldn’t

          I don’t know if that really makes them worse than premature death.

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It’s worse because smoking had started to be relegated to designated areas. Non smokers could much more easily avoid smokers. But vaping is so easy to do that you can no longer avoid them. You go to a gathering of any kind and you’re guaranteed to have at least one arsehole not respecting other peoples decisions to not smoke/vape

          • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            People who vape are using nicotine much, much more often because it’s just so much easier now. And it taste like bubblegum. The whole idea of vape as a means to quit smoking was a myth created by vaping companies. Nicotine is also bad for you, not just the smoke. And then there’s the issues of the other compounds inside vaping liquids that should be heading into your lungs. It’s insane we let this get this far.

            • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              You mentioned popcorn lung 3 times already and i did look it up and i think you don’t understand what popcorn lung is, so i will write it for whoever is reading because i didn’t know either.

              Popcorn lung is a colloquialism for an illness named bronchiolitis obliterans, caused by diacetyl, a product found on early black market vapes that has been banned or discontinued for nearly 10 years now. Most clear market vapes already had discontinued the use of dyacetyl because they knew of the health risks, but only black market vapes were using it as a means to save money.

              Moreover, dyacetyl was not being used in nicotine vapes, it was being used in Cannabis vapes, as such, no exclusively nicotine products vaper who used store bought liquids was ever exposed to popcorn lung. So maybe you should read up on what popcorn lung is, before posting several comments about it. I don’t vape but i have family members who quit smoking because of vapes and i don’t appreciate your blatant misinformation about them. If there are legitimate criticisms of vaping, by all means post them, but this is a falsehood you are propagating.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Oh boo hoo!

          People being mildly annoying means they should be banned? Cigarettes were killing smokers and those around them. That’s the line for me. If your actions harm others, then it gets restricted.

          Vapes are nowhere near that line. They just smell weird.

          • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I don’t want any sort of chemical in my lungs, I should be able to choose what to inhale not the selfish arsehole stood in front of me. I or others should not be affected by other people’s bad decisions.

          • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            They really are. Popcorn lung is a thing with vapers. Plus I don’t want to inhale their nasty nicotine on accident. They need to have some damn respect for people around them instead of blatant selfishness. That’s the line for me.

            • wewbull@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Secondhand nicotine does you no harm. The reason cigarettes are so bad for you is that you’re smoking tar. That’s what makes the walls of a smokers home yellow, and what gives them cancer.

              Nicotine is addictive, but largely harmless at the levels in cigarettes and vapes for the primary smoker. A secondhand smoker will be getting almost nothing. The problem with vapes is, I suspect, the flavourings. I’m aware of mounting evidence that they’re not harmless, but I think that’s only to primary vapers, not secondary.

      • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Vaping is currently almost completely unregulated and some studies have found terrifying chemicals in them

    • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      People who don’t like cancer and want to take the insane pressure these death sticks put on the health service.

      Who in their right mind supports mega corps selling addictive cancer causing products to young people?

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The point is prohibition doesn’t work. I would prefer no young person ever try cigarettes, or nicotine in any form. But I don’t think that’s realistic.

        • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          It works really well for kids. They aren’t even trying to ban it for adults.

          Raising the age from 16 to 18 had a massive effect when I was young.

          This will most likely dramatically decrease smoking in young people and that’s great.

          It’s not 100% or nothing.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I’d love to be wrong about this. But I started smoking at 20, and while I’ve kicked cigarettes for good I couldn’t make quitting nicotine stick.

            • GetOffMyLan@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              The difference is now you wouldn’t be able to buy it at 20 either.

              You’d have to work pretty hard to get on cigarettes and hopefully most people just won’t bother.

              Nicotine is still bullshit as are vapes. But as far as we know vapes are the lesser evil.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You know this, but nicotine isn’t the problem. It’s all the other crap in them.

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Sure, but on another level yes, nicotine is a problem. It’s super fucking addictive and I hate my dependence on it. And harsher regulation on nicotine products in my area have ironically made it tougher to ween myself off.

            • wewbull@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I think that last point is an important one.

              Banning things often does more harm than good. In your case “Nicotine Bad!” as a policy removes your options.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They are an island nation with very strict controls. The black market will be small. The real worry would be no different than age restrictions already in effect: find someone old enough to buy it for you.

      • sazey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Bruh. You do know you are talking about the cocaine capital of Europe here with your deluded “but they’re an island nation!” talk.

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Because it’s a gradual ban, rather than a blanket ban for everyone immediately, they are hoping the demand won’t be there by the time the last generation of legal smokers die off (sooner than you think given cigarettes are designed to kill).

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      People who don’t understand how things work.

      Or people who benefit from there being more criminals…