edit: The reason I find it an odd term is because human ancestry literally doesn’t follow a line. It always branches off, even if only to just include two parents. It’s a tree like structure, a line would misrepresent it

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Glad to help.

      It’s a weird concept outside of inheritance - for example, a royal bloodline could end because the regent dies without children. Because the upstream follows the ruler, you might have to backtrack up the bloodline to find the next heritor, which you’d call a branch bloodline

      But in modern life? It’s kinda pointless as a concept. We care about heredity and family, not bloodlines

      • Randomgal
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 days ago

        … Not bloodlines.

        That’s what someone from a weak bloodline would say.