• cygnus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If that’s the case, can you explain to the rest of us why landlords want high construction prices?

    • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They’re not construction prices lol. Construction costs are like 5% of the total value of a home. The other 95% of the value of a home is due to houses being treated as assets in a speculative market.

      Landlords want the prices to increase because it increases the value of their asset, which allows them to leverage it for greater loans to buy more assets, etc etc to eventually sell at hilariously inflated prices for massive ROIs. Or alternatively to charge massively inflated rental costs pegged to the value of the home. Higher value, higher rent, more $$$ in the landlord’s pocket.

      So far costs of homes have only gone up since the 70’s. A house worth 200k 20 years ago is now worth 1.2 Mil. It is an excellent rate of return. The market shows no signs of slowing down, forget about getting cheaper. If you have the capital to invest, it’s basically free money. Or at least, it has been for the past 5 decades. I don’t see why it would stop now. Maybe climate disasters or war, we’ll see.

      • cygnus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        Construction costs are like 5% of the total value of a home.

        Maybe in Manhattan, but otherwise this is an absolutely pants-on-head ridiculous claim.

        • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          I wasn’t exaggerating. Go to any new development site. American homes are literally made of plywood and paper. Materials used for houses now are largely the same as 20 years ago. If the same house that cost 200k 20 years ago now costs 1 Mil, the cost of materials did not increase by 400%.