• YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I don’t understand the benefit in doing this.

    Security. Torvalds did this for security.

    Is it really that hard to parse?

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      And I’ll say the same here as I did above. If it was for security, their code is tainted too. It’s an arbitrary reaction that is not complete as a solution to anything.

      • walden@sub.wetshaving.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 minutes ago

        They can check existing code. You have to be able to trust people who are contributing.

        They can check new code by these risky people as it comes in, but it why risk it?