ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 21 hours agoIn light of Linux removing ReiserFSslrpnk.netimagemessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1211arrow-down17
arrow-up1204arrow-down1imageIn light of Linux removing ReiserFSslrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 21 hours agomessage-square36fedilink
minus-squareBlaster M@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·20 hours agoInteresting to see how many features NTFS does support
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·18 hours agoThat’s why it’s still being used. Not a major reason to move on for MS. Sad to see APFS not on the list (I know why, just wanted to compare).
minus-squaresik0fewllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·17 hours agoNot sure if it’s gotten better in the last few years, but it’s also incredibly slow. Like orders of magnitude slower than ext3 or HFS.
minus-squareQuarterSwede@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·16 hours agoI’ve never thought of APFS as slow. Didn’t realize it was.
minus-squaresik0fewllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·16 hours agoOops, replied to wrong comment! I was talking about NTFS.
minus-squareundefined@links.hackliberty.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 hours agoYeah that was kind of a weird take, I’ve never felt it being slow nor heard it is from anywhere else.
Interesting to see how many features NTFS does support
That’s why it’s still being used. Not a major reason to move on for MS.
Sad to see APFS not on the list (I know why, just wanted to compare).
Not sure if it’s gotten better in the last few years, but it’s also incredibly slow. Like orders of magnitude slower than ext3 or HFS.
I’ve never thought of APFS as slow. Didn’t realize it was.
Oops, replied to wrong comment! I was talking about NTFS.
Yeah that was kind of a weird take, I’ve never felt it being slow nor heard it is from anywhere else.