• 5dh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Good. We don’t (anymore) need a new iPhone / MacBook / iPad every year. Only when the improvements are substantial. Now they’re just adding and changing things to make it seem like anything changed at all compared to the previous generation of devices.

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Then don’t buy a new iPhone/MacBook/iPad every year.

      I personally prefer to buy a device that’s as up-to-date as possible whenever I buy it. I wouldn’t want to buy an expensive device that’s 2.5 years old when I buy it only for it to get replaced by its successor half a year down the line.

      • Kelsenellenelvial
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep, lots of things like cars, home appliances, home theatre components, etc. get regular, if not yearly, updates even when some of those things have a 10+ year lifecycle for the average consumer. It’s not like Apple stops supporting devices after a couple years. With things like the Apple TV that aren’t updated as often I end up putting off buying something that I want because, like you said, it might already be 2+ years old and I wouldn’t want to feel behind when the new one comes out less than a year later. I’d rather see smaller updates more often so there’s always something recent when I’m looking to buy.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Why not? While it does seem wasteful that people actually get a new phone every year, I want to see a new model every year so I can decide when it’s sufficiently improved over the one I currently own, or I may want to decide on an older model so want there to be one with whatever I feel is sufficient. Having new models every year gives us all more choice, not just anyone who may replace theirs that frequently

      Edit: I really want an Apple TV, but there are constant technology changes so buying the current two year old design seems like a bad idea. It may still work but Why would I invest in a truncated future? If there were a 2024 version, I would already have it. Maybe even if there was a 2023 version

      • 5dh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        I get your point. But we’d probably adjust if there’s less releases, I think. More choice might not be better when it comes to the planet and it’s natural resources. And we’re now at a point where phones barely change when compared to the year before.

        If there’s a new iPhone every two years, you can still decide when the improvements justify upgrading for you.

      • deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I really want an Apple TV, but there are constant technology changes so buying the current two year old design seems like a bad idea.

        I’ve got a first gen ATV4K and the newer one - the only difference I’ve noticed over the years is the remote. We bought a current gen remote for the old one and it’s the same experience. Just pull the trigger, if you’ve got Apple devices it’s a great streaming box. ATV4K is not where the constant technology changes are happening.