Its like Hillary walking into a working class kitchen for the first time.

They’ve been shielded from even critical support of China and other AES for so long they literally, not figuratively, literally cannot process that people exist that have beliefs that aren’t Reddit Approved. They immediately assume it’s bots or wumao. Human beings can’t possibly hold these beliefs, so they must be Oriental hordes or actual robots.

      • CatholicSocialist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t care if they’re holding people accountable for corruption. Why does a country supposably aiming for socialism have BILLIONAIRES in the FIRST PLACE??

        • RedDawn [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          1 year ago

          They have them as a byproduct of Deng’s reforms which allowed rapid development of the means of production, they need to be managed of course and suppressed by the people’s democratic dictatorship, which they are. Eventually development will reach the point where they are no longer useful and can be fully done away with.

          • CatholicSocialist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mhm keep telling yourself that hun. That’s a lot of words for “trust us bro the hyper capitalism is temporary”

            • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The point of Deng’s reforms were to avoid getting killed in the crib by the west. Take their money and productive capacity in the short term to prevent them from couping/bombing you, and then when you’ve finished eating their lunch, you can do a socialist rug pull. Will it happen? Remains to be seen - but as for the capitalism, there are positive indications of tamping down on it. The anti-corruption purges are a great start. They rooted out many opportunist elements within the party, put the screws on capital and reasserted party primacy, and got the party back on track as a principled organization with serious cadre all around. That’s a positive development and puts them in a stronger position to manage a transition to a worker’s state when productive capacity and geopolitical conditions favor it.

              In addition, some industries are being heavily restricted and reformed to prevent bourgeois saturation. Take education for example; foreign and private schools were rampant profit making/status manufacturing machines in China. These have been all but eliminated as for profit industries due to their misalignment with socialist development. This is just an example, not an exhaustive list.

            • RedDawn [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not in any sense “hyper” capitalism to begin with, it’s a limited form of capitalism while the working class maintains political control via the CPC and the stage maintains ownership of the commanding heights of the economy, for starters. And since the CPC has made good on pretty much all of its stated goals (usually ahead of schedule) and consistently improved conditions for everybody in the country for decades on end, what reason do I have to doubt their process?

        • iie [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          it was either embrace partial capitalism or get strangled out of the world economy. Deng’s reforms brought a massive influx of foreign investment and expertise.

            • SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              30
              ·
              1 year ago

              The wealth of Norway depends on the imperialist white supremacist settler colonial extractive ventures of the West. The wealth of China does not. Simple as.

              • CatholicSocialist@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                This isn’t about wealth. Does Norway have 12 year olds in factories? Tell me why Norway gives workers 3x more paid time off? Don’t you think China’s rich enough to make things better for workers?

                • SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  21
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Does Norway have 12 year olds in factories?

                  Literally yes, in third world countries.

                  3x more paid time off

                  They can afford to without the threat of economic domination by burgerstan, also see point 1 above.

                  China also is making things better for workers, moreso than America or even the declining Nordic states.

        • MattsAlt [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          Dogmatism and ideological purity are blinding you. It certainly should be a conversation about why billionaires exist in China, especially as they strengthen their safeguards against capital flight, but their existence alone does not discredit the great strides of progress China has made under SwCC in under a century. There are few examples of such a large mass of people seeing such substantive improvements in their lives. No matter the system, such dramatic change will result in unforseen consequences because there is so much change occuring. The measure of the response though is what is important: protecting themselves from capital flight, placing party leadership within corporations, focusing on carbon reduction through reduced pollution, tree planting, and alternative energy sources are all measurable ways the government is correcting. Where else do you see such response by those in power for their citizens? The Chinese approval for their government is incredibly high, and this is why

          • CatholicSocialist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is Chinese capitalism efficient, and has the government helped the people’s material conditions (other than minorities/dissidents)? Yes. Are they aiming for socialism? No.

            • MattsAlt [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              So I gather that the relatively few dissidents in mainstream media is how you decide that there is excessive repression? Could it be that so many in China approve of their government that there just aren’t many dissidents and those who do speak out aren’t covered in the media you consume unless they face consequences?

              As far as minorities, there has been progress for the LGBTQ+ community as well as religious minorities and other races. Could it be better and faster? Certainly, but that doesn’t mean it’s not happening or they are regressing.

              As far as whether they are progressing towards socialism, if you believe Marx and Lenin, state capitalism is a necessary step towards communism and is generally accepted as ‘socialism’. What do you then classify as socialism?

    • emizeko [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Li: At the moment, the Chinese the party state has proven an extraordinary ability to change. I mean, I make the joke: “in America you can change the political party, but you can’t change the policies. In China you cannot change the party, but you can change policies.” So, in the past 66 years, China has been run by one single party. Yet the political changes that have taken place in China in these past 66 years have been wider, and broader, and greater than probably any other major country in modern memory.

      Pilger: So in that time China ceased to be communist. Is that what you’re saying?

      Li: Well, China is a market economy, and it’s a vibrant market economy. But it is not a capitalist country. Here’s why: there’s no way a group of billionaires could control the Politburo as billionaires control American policy-making. So in China you have a vibrant market economy, but capital does not rise above political authority. Capital does not have enshrined rights. In America, capital — the interests of capital and capital itself — has risen above the American nation. The political authority cannot check the power of capital. That’s why America is a capitalist country, and China is not.

      from https://redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/