@mike I think with the “shouldn’t have been printed vs should be printed into the ground” thing, the idea is it shouldn’t have been printed in the first place because it’s bad for the format, which is also why it should be banned. But given the reality that it was printed, it should at least not be strongly gate-kept due to price, creating a high amount of inequality. Especially because that high price limits options later.
@mike I think with the “shouldn’t have been printed vs should be printed into the ground” thing, the idea is it shouldn’t have been printed in the first place because it’s bad for the format, which is also why it should be banned. But given the reality that it was printed, it should at least not be strongly gate-kept due to price, creating a high amount of inequality. Especially because that high price limits options later.
Ty that is a good explanation of that, that makes sense